A cross-party group of MPs has launched a new inquiry to examine the government’s approach to permitted development rights.
Permitted developments rights (PDR) allow for certain changes to be made to a building without the need to apply for planning permission, like converting an office block into flats.
In recent years, the use of PDRs has been expanded, but they have proved to be controversial for many people.
In February 2020, MP Robert Halfon described converted office blocks in his Harlow constituency as ‘ghetto building, human warehousing and social cleansing’.
The inquiry by the housing, communities and local government select committee will examine the impact that an expansion of the PDR system has had, and will continue to have, on the planning system and the governments targets for new homes and economic growth.
It will also examine the impact at a local level, including the ability of local authorities to plan development holistically, developer contributions and the provision of services to meet changing local needs.
The inquiry will also consider the further changes to permitted development outlined in the planning white paper.
‘Local communities face an unprecedented challenge,’ said committee chair, Clive Betts.
‘The Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown has placed severe pressures on urban environments that were already struggling. As we look to return to normal life we still don’t know what the long-term outlook will be, both in terms of the viability of existing commercial and office space or the need for domestic housing.
‘Given these uncertainties it is crucial that the right framework is in place to support local communities to adapt to meet the new reality, whatever it may be. The government has indicated its intention to use permitted development rights to allow greater flexibility in how buildings are used, removing the need for planning approval for switching use between offices, shops and housing under certain circumstances,’ added Mr Betts.
‘We have launched this inquiry to understand the implications of this approach. Does it provide sufficient scope for local authorities to set out a coherent plan that addresses local needs? How well does it support the government’s broader goals for economic development and housing capacity? Fundamentally, do they enable the economic and societal recovery we need.’
Photo Credit – Pixabay